If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
Are you or a relative a current or former member of the military? Do you like writing about your experience with the military? Have you benefited from the financial or education benefits the military provides? If so, enter the ArmyStudyGuide Military Blogger Contest for a chance to win up to $1,000.
This contest is open to current and former members of all branches of the military–not just the Army–and their immediate families.
This posting starts a series of blog posts I will be doing about Afghanistan. These will be posted both here and under my other blog, Afghanistan Lessons Learned at afghanlessons.blogpost.com.
A Brief History of Afghanistan (334 B.C.- Jan 2010) • 334-326 BCE: Alexander the Great’s conquests Establishes many trade centers in Afghanistan to include Kandahar and Herat
• 30-248 CE: Kushan Empire The Kushans were great patrons of Buddhist art and culture; Bamiyan Buddha statues erected
• 642 – 1187 CE: Islamic Conquest of Afghanistan Resulting in the conversion of Afghanistan to Islam from the pre-invasion practices of Buddhism, Zoroastrianism, Hinduism and other belief systems
• 962 – 1186: Ghaznavid Dynasty A Persian dynasty of Turkic origins centered in Ghazni, brought in language (Dari) and a rich Persian culture to Afghanistan
• 1219: Mongol Invasion The Mongols devastated Afghanistan, killing the population of major city centers, causing the population to revert to an agrarian rural society
• 1747-1826: Durrani Empire This was the beginning of the modern Afghan State and the Pashtun ruling class
• 1839-1842: First Anglo-Afghan War
The start of the “Great Game”, which was a power struggle between Russia and Great Britain in an effort to win power and dominance in the region; Britain occupies Afghanistan and uses it as a buffer to protect British India from Russian territory
• 1878-1880: Second Anglo-Afghan War Afghans attempt to oust British control of the country
• 1893: British establish the Durand Line This disputed border separating Afghanistan from British Indian territories would eventually lead to strained relationships between Afghanistan and the new state of Pakistan; Durand line designed with the defense of India in mind
• 1919: Third Anglo-Afghan War After which Afghanistan gains full independence from Britain
• 1919 – 1929: The Kingdom of Afghanistan King Amanullah moved to end his country’s long-standing isolation and develop diplomatic relationships with most major countries; slavery abolished in 1923 •1973: Republic of Afghanistan Monarchy abolished; establishment of a republic
• 1978: Coup by communists backed directly by Soviet Union
• 1979: Soviets invade, install pro-Moscow government
• 1980s: Anti-Soviet jihad fought by the Mujahedeen
• 1989: Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan
• 1992: Last Communist regime falls; Mujahideen forces vie for power and factional infighting begins
• 1994: Civil war intensifies; 70% of country destroyed; Taliban rise to power
• 1996: Taliban capture Kabul and declare Islamic Emirate; Osama bin Laden relocates to Afghanistan
• 1996 – 2001: Era of Taliban government’s “Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan”; based loosely in Shari’a Law
• 1998: U.S. cruise missiles strike an Al Qaeda terrorist training complex in Afghanistan
• Sep 2001: Northern Alliance leader Ahmad Shah Masood killed by Al Qaeda; attacks on World Trade Center and Pentagon
• Oct 2001: Coalition forces begin air and ground operations in Afghanistan, support to Northern Alliance
• Nov 2001: Northern Alliance captures Kabul
• Dec 2001: Taliban fall from power; Bonn Agreement establishes Afghan Interim Administration with Hamid Karzai elected as chairman
• Jun 2002: Hamid Karzai becomes interim President
• 2002-2003: International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) forces responsible for Kabul
• Aug 2003: NATO assumes command of ISAF
• Jan 2004: NATO/ISAF assumes responsibility for Northern Afghanistan and begins gradual transition of responsibility from the US led coalition
• Jan 2004: New constitution introduced
• Oct 2004: Presidential elections, Karzai elected
• Oct 2006: NATO assumes responsibility for security across Afghanistan
• Jul 2007: Former King Zahir Shah dies
• Aug 2007: Opium production soars to a record high, according to UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC)
• Nov 2009: President Karzai sworn in for second term amid controversy and accusations of ballot stuffing
• Dec 2009: President Obama to increase troop strength in Afghanistan from 68,000 to 100,000
• Jan 2010: Taliban introduce a “Code of Conduct” in an effort to reduce civilian casualties, soften their image, and win allies
Now let me make sure I understand this correctly. It is bad enough that the Army caved into the Political Correctness pressures that they are so quick to criticize (in the Maj Hasan case) and allow in these Sikh brothers that knew what the Army grooming standards were. Yes the Army let them in and let them keep their beards, etc. in respect of their Sikh religion.
But now THIS!!!
Is that a ACU camouflaged turban with FRICKEN Captains rank on it? I am thinking I have about seen it all when it comes to an Army that is more concerned with people’s feelings and everyone getting a trophy than developing the warriors we need…warriors that must adhere to the proper discipline.
Ohh and don’t even get me F@#$$@# started on the “I am a Sikh Warrior” crap. How about “I am an American Warrior”?? Huh?
Capt. (Dr.) Tejdeep Singh Rattan proclaims "I am a Sikh warrior" to the delight of his classmates after exiting the gas chamber during nuclear, biological and chemical training at Camp Bullis, Texas, March 17. (Photo by U.S. Army)
It appears that President Obama is about to test his ability to woo people and capatalize on this once high popularity. He is going to try and convince French President Nicolas Sarkozy to go against the majority of the French people and send more troops to Afghanistan.
Fortifying the international force in Afghanistan is a fresh concern for Obama after his first presidential trip to Kabul. And a key aim of Sarkozy’s trip to Washington is to show that France is a firm U.S. ally in fighting terrorism, from central Asia to North Africa and beyond.
Lord knows we need all the help we can get there, however it needs to be the right help. As long as these troops are contributing to the fight and not detracting from it then it will be good. Not like back in 06-07 when the French were teaching the officers that officers do everything (like the soviets also believed) and that NCOs only do what they are told and have no role. See the French, like the Soviets see no real value in the NCO corps like the US, UK and Aussies do, to name a few. So while the US and British forces were teaching Basic Training and NCO schools, the French were teaching officers schools.
When a US NCO I know talked and then argued with a French army officer about this and was telling him they should be doing it different, the French officer told him that “if he didn’t like it, then go complain to NATO because that is the way the French teach”.
So what this means downrange is that the Embedded Mentors and Trainers like me had to de-program the officers for the entire year we were there to not do it the French way, but instead the right way. To rely on the NCO corps, to use them as the backbone of the Army and not as the chai boys of the officers.
This is why I say that as long as the French are going to be productive and not counter-productive then I think we would welcome them with open arms.
War is Hell, no matter how you slice it or dice it bad stuff happens and sometimes to good people…sometimes.
The top US commander in Afghanistan has acknowledged his forces failure to reduce civilian casualties, as the US-led alliance faces Afghan anger over high civilian death. General Stanley McChrystal admitted in a videoconference that so far many civilians have fallen victim to arbitrary firing from convoys and checkpoints in Afghanistan, Press TV reported. “We have shot an amazing number of people, but to my knowledge, none has ever proven to be a threat,” the top general said. Since assuming power last year, McChrystal has sought to reduce the killing of civilians through tougher rules. United Nations human rights researchers say the new directives have led to a 28 percent reduction in such casualties.
If you aren’t from Western New York or Canada then you probably don’t know what a timbit is, or Tim’s (as they call it in Canada) or Timmy Ho’s as we call it in New York. For those not from this part of the world, what I am referring to is Tim Horton’s. Tim Horton’s is to Canada what Dunkin’ donuts is to most of the United States.
Just like there are Burger King’s, Popeye’s, or even TGI Fridays in some deployed areas around the world to bring comforts of home to US Troops, there are Timmy Ho’s in areas where Canadian troops are deployed. Places like Kandahar, Afghanistan for instance.
It is ironic that while the US is pulling out and stopping some of their US-based reminders from existing in the war zone, that Canada is considering giving the workers of Timmy Ho’s Canadian war medals.
A major overhaul of how the Canadian Forces recognizes overseas service will include the controversial decision to allow Tim Hortons employees at Kandahar Airfield to receive medals from the Afghan war. The changes involve clarifying the type of support eligible for the military’s General Service Medal, which will now be awarded to both civilian as well as allied and Canadian military personnel deployed outside the country to provide direct support to operations in the “presence of an armed enemy.” The decision, which has raised eyebrows in the military community, echoes similar methods of recognition applied during the Second World War, according to the Department of Defence. Medals were awarded during the Second World War to civilians working for Salvation Army, Knights of Columbus, the Canadian Legion and the YMCA. “I’m not sure it’s quite the same here,” said Jack Granatstein, a senior research fellow at the Canadian Defence and Foreign Affairs Institute. “They were authorized by the government and they were doing a job that the government thought they could do better. I suppose you could say that’s not all that dissimilar than Tim Hortons, but Tim Hortons is commercial as opposed to a service group. It doesn’t make me whoop and cheer.” Andre Levesque, the Defence Department’s director of honours and recognition, acknowledged that recognition for those selling doughnuts and coffee at Kandahar Airfield seems odd, but cited the historical example as precedent. “Everyone who goes into theatre and did their days — respective of what they did — they’re part of the defence team and everyone deserves to have their recognition,” he said. Other changes to the award process deal with such issues as how to honour soldiers who’ve performed multiple tours of war zones, how long troops have to serve before being recognized, as well as clarifying the type of support that is eligible for the military’s General Service Medal. “From our point of view, having talked to everyone, we feel this new way is what most of the soldiers want,” Mr. Levesque said. Honouring multiple tours of such war zones as Afghanistan, a key concern among some soldiers, will be dealt with by issuing “rotation bars” emblazoned with a Maple Leaf recognizing each period of 180 days of eligible service that has been accumulated after the initial qualifying period of 30 days. Mr. Levesque said the rotation bars allow for easy recognition of those who served numerous times. “When everyone is lined up on parade on Remembrance Day, and you look at their medals, everyone will instantly know those who were there for a short term versus those who were there for a longer term,” he said. The new system also provides for a more standardized way to recognize overseas service. The Canadian Forces points out that under the previous system, military personnel serving in Afghanistan facing the same danger at the same time could receive different recognition if they are working under different chains of command. In some cases, the eligibility requirements have been lowered. The time period needed to qualify for the General Service Medal has been lowered to 30 days from 90 days. The medal will honour those who supported the Afghan mission, ranging from Tim Hortons employees at Kandahar Airfield to Foreign Affairs and Canadian International Development Agency personnel in the country to Forces personnel at Camp Mirage, the military’s base in the United Arab Emirates. Gordon Ritchie, president of Montreal’s Black Watch Association veteran’s group, vehemently disagrees with the change in eligibility, which he thinks waters down the importance of the honour: “You’re going to get a lot of rear-echelon people who just go over to hunt for medals, do their 30 days in some place safe and say, ‘Look I did my time in Afghanistan, I’m a hero, worship me.’” Mr. Granatstein said he thinks the Canadian Forces may have been motivated to make the changes after facing pressure because U.S. soldiers receive more medals than Canadians. “There’s probably pressure to give more, and I suspect it’s that that drives this,” he said. The Defence Department’s review of honours and medals for overseas service was the most comprehensive done since the Korean War and affects not only those who served in the Afghan mission but on future missions, as well. Mr. Levesque said other missions from previous years also will be recognized.
The 2010 Milbloggie nominations start this Wednesday. I got received the email from JP of www.milblogging.com a few minutes ago.
The
Milbloggies Award recognizes military bloggers for their contribution
to blogging, news and information, and to the military over the past
year. Nomination and Voting Overview 1. A military blog can be nominated ONLY once by the same registered user.However, a user can nominate as many military blogs as they wish. The nomination phase starts Wednesday, March 31st, 2010 and all nominations must be
submitted online through Milblogging.com by 11:59 pm EST on Saturday, April 3rd, 2010. 2.The
top five nominees in each branch category will be announced on
Sunday, April 4th, 2010 and those nominees will move into the Voting
Phase beginning April 4th, 2010. 3. Nominees may be military blogs that belong to the following branch categories in the Milblogging.com database: U.S. Military Parent U.S. Military Supporter U.S. Air Force U.S. Army U.S. Navy U.S. Marine Corps U
.S. Coast Guard U.S. Military Veteran U.S. Military Spouse Foreign National Military U.S. Reporter 4. To nominate and/or vote for a military blog, you must be signed in to the website.Registration is quick and free and you will not receive any SPAM.This helps maintain the integrity of voting by reducing possible click fraud.To
place your nomination, simply click on the listing in the Milblogging.com database starting the evening of Wednesday, March 31st,
2010, and click the Nominate button that appears at the top of the
military blog profile. Keep in mind, the Nominate button will not
be shown on the website until Wednesday, March 31st.&nbs
p; If
you do not want your blog considered for a Milbloggie award, please
send me an email and I can temporarily place your blog in the
Uncategorized category.Also, if your blog is
not properly categorized, please update the category by claiming your
blog or by sending me an email with the change. 5. To vote for a military blog (once the nomination phase is over), a chart will be published that includes the top nominees in each category, along with the ability to vote. The Voting will close on Wednesday, April 7th at 11:59 PM EST. 6.Winners will be presented awards at the 2010 Milblog Conference on April 10th.Winners are not required to attend the conference in order to receive their awards. Questions? Comments? Concerns? Feel free to send an email to milblogging@gmail.com To see the winners and finalists of the FIRST ANNUAL MILBLOGGIES, click here. For updated news on this year’s Milbloggies, stay tuned here. Twitter Hashtag:#milbloggies